Global News Roundup ~ Revue De Presse Internationale (Français) ~ Revista de prensa (Español)
| ❎ |
Jared Kushner has garnered attention for his unequivocal stance against a ceasefire, asserting that "Israel has no way back. They cannot afford to not finish the job now." [גליה גור זאב, JDN] This perspective echoes a growing apprehension among certain U.S. officials regarding the potential dangers of halting military operations at this pivotal moment. Kushner stressed the necessity for Israel to dismantle the arsenal that poses a threat, contending that "They will never get another chance." [גליה גור זאב, JDN] His comments emerge in response to calls for restraint from various political factions, underscoring the divergent views on how to navigate the ongoing conflict.
Furthermore, Kushner's statement that "I have dedicated countless hours studying Hezbollah" underscores his profound engagement with the complexities of the Middle Eastern landscape. He pointed to the tactical successes Israel has realized, arguing that the current opportunity to neutralize Hezbollah is unparalleled. He posited that "Failing to fully exploit this opportunity to neutralize the threat is irresponsible," [דב גיל-הר, כאן | תאגיד השידור הישראלי] a sentiment that resonates with advocates for decisive military action in the region.
As discussions surrounding a potential ceasefire persist, Kushner's position raises pertinent questions about the future of U.S.-Israel relations. He argued that "President Trump often said that 'Iran has never won a war but has never lost a negotiation,'" [ynet ידיעות אחרונות] suggesting a belief that military pressure could foster a more favorable negotiating environment in the long term.
Kushner has described the elimination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah as "the most important day in the Middle East since the breakthrough of the Abraham Accords." [גליה גור זאב, JDN] This assertion underscores a potential shift in the balance of power within the region, indicating that the current military actions could redefine geopolitical alliances and security dynamics. He contended that "Iran is now fully exposed," alluding to a perceived vulnerability that Israel could capitalize on.
By framing the recent military actions as a defining moment, Kushner suggests that they could herald a new era in Middle Eastern politics. He asserted that "As the Iranian proxies and threats dissipate, regional security and prosperity will rise for Christians, Muslims, and Jews alike," [הידברות] championing a vision of regional stability that transcends sectarian divides.
This viewpoint is not without its critics, as some contend that such an approach could exacerbate tensions and incite further conflict. Nevertheless, Kushner's remarks reflect a strategic mindset aimed at long-term security objectives, which he believes could lead to a more peaceful and prosperous Middle East.
Kushner's staunch opposition to calls for a ceasefire reveals a significant divide in perspectives regarding the management of the conflict. He argued that "Those calling for a ceasefire in the North are mistaken," [דב גיל-הר, כאן | תאגיד השידור הישראלי] emphasizing that any retreat could jeopardize Israel's security. His critique extends to the Biden administration, which has faced mounting pressure to advocate for restraint, suggesting that such positions may be influenced by domestic political considerations rather than regional realities.
In this context, Kushner's appeal for the U.S. to support Israel's military objectives resonates with those who perceive the current moment as a unique opportunity to address longstanding security threats. He contended that "This is no longer just Israel's struggle," [סרוגים] framing the conflict as one that carries broader implications for U.S. interests and allies in the region.
As the debate continues, the contrasting narratives surrounding military action versus diplomatic solutions highlight the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Kushner's perspective injects a sense of urgency into the ongoing discussions, suggesting that the decisions made now could have enduring consequences for the future of peace and stability in the region.